home subscribe advertise reprints e-mail help RSS about us LOG IN

Mortgage News


Mortgage News

HOT Topics









site map

twitter linkedin
facebook google+

Mortgage News

News by Subject
Complete list of specialty news sections.

Purchase Subscription
Subscribe to MortgageDaily.com and get immediate access to all news, statistics and archives.

Mortgage Advertising
Reach mortgage executives, loan originators and other people tied to mortgage industry.

Consumer Mortgage News
Free mortgage news for prospective borrowers.

Mortgage Newsletter
Free e-mail newsletter with the latest headlines from MortgageDaily.com.

Mortgage News Reprints
Put entire MortgageDaily.com stories in your online or printed newsletter or publication.

Mortgage Feedget RSS code
Condensed MortgageDaily.com stories free on your Web site or for your RSS reader.

News Archives
Archive of MortgageDaily.com stories by month going back to 1999.

Press Releases
Reports and announcements from MortgageDaily.com.

Mortgage Statistics
Data and statistics for real estate finance.

Mortgage Directories
Directories of lenders, branch operators and mortgage service providers.

Mortgage Graphs
Directories of lenders, branch operators and mortgage service providers.

FHA News | Government Resources | M o r t g a g e e Letters | FHA Statistics
FHA, VA and HECM mortgage news. HUD and G i n n i e news also. Originations, servicing and FHA approval.

Cost for Bush 100% FHA: $1/2 Billion

Taxpayer costs estimates vary for zero down mortgage

October 7, 2004


President George Bush's election year promise of promoting zero down payment mortgages will apparently come with a cost -- as in $500 million.

That's how much the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says the legislation would cost taxpayers over four years through defaults on government insured Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans.

"Zero down payment loans are viewed by private-sector lenders as having a higher risk of default than traditional mortgages with down payments," the CBO says in a written report.

Bush has long been advocate of offering government-backed mortgage loans that require no down payments. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) estimates than 150,000 people would annually qualify for the loans.

The president made the legislation, which is pending in the U.S. House, part of a speech he recently delivered to the National Association of Home Builders in Columbus, Ohio.

"To build an ownership society, we'll help even more Americans buy homes," Bush said in a transcript of the speech posted on the White House Web site. "Some families are more able to pay a mortgage, but just don't have the savings to put money down.

"So I'm asking Congress to pass my zero down payment initiative," he said. "We should remove the 3 percent down payment rule for first time home buyers with FHA-insured mortgages."

Democratic presidential John Kerry has not endorsed the bill, according to his campaign's Web site.

But plenty of mortgage-related industry groups have, including the Mortgage Bankers Association of America (MBA).

"A lot of consumers have the income to make mortgage payments and have a good credit record, but can't overcome the hurdle of a down payment," Kurt Pfotenhauer, MBA senior vice president of government affairs, said in a statement. "This legislation will give future homeowners a chance to own a home today. We encourage Congress to pass this legislation."

Also on board is the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

"A new zero down payment product will greatly expand the reach of the FHA program," the NAR said in a statement. "As housing prices continue to rise in many communities, prospective home buyers might qualify for an FHA loan but can't come up with the down payment and closing costs necessary for homeownership."

"The (legislation) would eliminate this problem and create a whole new market of home buyers," NAR President Walt McDonald said in the statement.

FHA Commissioner John C. Weicher told members of Congress in March that the program would not lose money.

But Dr. Ronald D. Utt of the Heritage Foundation, a Washington think tank, has written that the program would be "wasteful and extravagant."

"Although encouraging homeownership is a useful policy goal from a variety of perspectives, policies to promote it should be ones that create opportunity and encourage individuals to save, not seek handouts," Utt wrote in a statement. "At a time when the American homeownership rate is the highest in history, and when there are already exist less costly federal programs operated by (FHA) to assist lower-income/savings-impaired families to buy a house the (legislation)...is a wasteful and counter-productive extravagance.

"To suggest tha