State
|
Layoffs
Full-Year 2009 |
Hirings
Full-Year 2009 |
Full-Year 2009 Net |
|
Layoffs
Q4 2009 |
Hirings
Q4 2009 |
Q4 2009 Net |
|
Q3 2009 Net |
|
Q2 2009 Net |
|
Q1 2009
Net
(revised) |
|
TOTAL
|
22,578 |
30,899 |
+8,321 |
|
2,995 |
5,849 |
+2,854 |
|
-710 |
|
+8,253 |
|
-2,076
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
30 |
30 |
|
0 |
30 |
+30 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Alaska |
0 |
0 |
00 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Arizona |
230 |
255 |
25 |
|
230 |
150 |
-80 |
|
+50 |
|
35 |
|
+20 |
|
California |
1,973 |
1,677 |
-296 |
|
313 |
1,300 |
987 |
|
-31 |
|
-423 |
|
-829 |
|
Colorado |
24 |
5 |
-19 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
-19 |
|
0 |
|
Connecticut |
100 |
70 |
-30 |
|
100 |
20 |
-80 |
|
0 |
|
50 |
|
0 |
|
Delaware |
65 |
0 |
-65 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
-65 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Florida |
2,605 |
1,460 |
-1,145 |
|
255 |
192 |
-63 |
|
-1,355 |
|
+595 |
|
-322 |
|
Georgia |
193 |
55 |
-138 |
|
118 |
0 |
-118 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
-20 |
|
Idaho |
0 |
18 |
18 |
|
0 |
18 |
+18 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Illinois |
2,797 |
405 |
-2,392 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
+388 |
|
-2,780 |
|
Indiana |
72 |
40 |
-32 |
|
50 |
40 |
-10 |
|
-22 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Iowa |
34 |
1,025 |
991 |
|
34 |
975 |
+941 |
|
+25 |
|
+25 |
|
0 |
|
Kansas |
0 |
90 |
90 |
|
0 |
55 |
+55 |
|
+35 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Kentucky |
0 |
380 |
380 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
+340 |
|
+40 |
|
Louisiana |
0 |
250 |
250 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
+250 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Maine |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Maryland |
0 |
50 |
50 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
+25 |
|
+25 |
|
Massachusetts |
160 |
0 |
-160 |
|
160 |
0 |
-160 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Michigan |
153 |
352 |
199 |
|
50 |
25 |
-25 |
|
+35 |
|
+89 |
|
+100 |
|
Minnesota |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Mississippi |
100 |
0 |
-100 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
-100 |
|
Missouri |
0 |
795 |
795 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
+700 |
|
+70 |
|
+25 |
|
Montana |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Nebraska |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Nevada |
0 |
20 |
20 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
+20 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
New Jersey |
278 |
0 |
-278 |
|
91 |
0 |
-91 |
|
-179 |
|
-8 |
|
0 |
|
New Mexico |
130 |
50 |
-80 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
-105 |
|
+25 |
|
New York |
780 |
422 |
-358 |
|
600 |
100 |
-500 |
|
+125 |
|
+164 |
|
-147 |
|
North Carolina |
871 |
1,381 |
510 |
|
0 |
313 |
+313 |
|
+171 |
|
-24 |
|
+50 |
|
Ohio |
285 |
165 |
-120 |
|
197 |
0 |
-197 |
|
+20 |
|
+95 |
|
-38 |
|
Oklahoma |
0 |
00 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Oregon |
0 |
76 |
76 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
+38 |
|
+38 |
|
Pennsylvania |
129 |
499 |
370 |
|
5 |
0 |
-5 |
|
+150 |
|
+125 |
|
+100 |
|
Rhode Island |
0 |
0 |
00 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
South Carolina |
0 |
30 |
30 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
+15 |
|
+15 |
|
Tennessee |
70 |
0 |
-70 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
-70 |
|
Texas |
122 |
1,722 |
1,600 |
|
47 |
91 |
+44 |
|
+478 |
|
+1,078 |
|
0 |
|
Utah |
100 |
0 |
-100 |
|
100 |
0 |
-100 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Virginia |
291 |
0 |
-291 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
-291 |
|
0 |
|
Washington |
1,429 |
390 |
-1,039 |
|
60 |
0 |
-60 |
|
-824 |
|
+165 |
|
-320 |
|
Washington, D.C. |
0 |
100 |
100 |
|
0 |
50 |
+50 |
|
+50 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Wisconsin |
107 |
227 |
120 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
+200 |
|
-80 |
|
West Virginia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
National
|
9,480 |
18,860 |
+9,380 |
|
585 |
2,490 |
+1,905 |
|
-343 |
|
+5,626 |
|
2,192 |
|
TOTAL
|
22,578 |
30,899 |
+8,321 |
|
2,995 |
5,849 |
2,854 |
|
-710 |
|
+8,253 |
|
-2,076
|
|
State
|
Layoffs
Full-Year 2009 |
Hirings
Full-Year 2009 |
Full-Year 2009 Net |
|
Layoffs
Q4 2009 |
Hirings
Q4 2009 |
Q4 2009 Net |
|
Q3 2009 Net |
|
Q2 2009 Net |
|
Q1 2009
Net
(revised) |
|
|
- Positive figures represent net job gains.
- Negative figures represent net job losses.
- Reflects mortgage layoffs, hirings and mortgage company closings tracked from Oct. 1, 2009, to Dec. 31, 2009, generally involving at least 50 people.
- The data was primarily derived from stories published by MortgageDaily.com
- With a few individual rounds of layoffs where only national totals were available and the impacted states were known, half of the layoffs were attributed to the state where the company was based and the rest were distributed among the remaining states.
- Layoffs in unknown multiple states where only national numbers were obtained were generally attributed half to the state where based and half to “National.”
- Some numbers were estimated.
- When bank-wide layoffs were reported, 10% was typically used to determine the mortgage job share.
|