twitter linkedin
facebook google+

Mortgage News

News by Subject
Complete list of specialty news sections.

Purchase Subscription
Subscribe to and get immediate access to all news, statistics and archives.

Mortgage Advertising
Reach mortgage executives, loan originators and other people tied to mortgage industry.

Consumer Mortgage News
Free mortgage news for prospective borrowers.

Mortgage Newsletter
Free e-mail newsletter with the latest headlines from

Mortgage News Reprints
Put entire stories in your online or printed newsletter or publication.

Mortgage Feedget RSS code
Condensed stories free on your Web site or for your RSS reader.

News Archives
Archive of stories by month going back to 1999.

Press Releases
Reports and announcements from

Mortgage Statistics
Data and statistics for real estate finance.

Mortgage Directories
Directories of lenders, branch operators and mortgage service providers.

Mortgage Graphs
Directories of lenders, branch operators and mortgage service providers.

home subscribe advertise reprints e-mail help RSS about us LOG IN

Mortgage News


Mortgage News

HOT Topics









site map
Mortgage Rate News | Mortgage Market Index | ARM indices | ARM Statistics
Average fixed and ARM rates. Rate forecasts. Quotes on ARM indexes including COFI, MTA, LIBOR & Treasuries. Rate reset studies and reports. Mortgage rate litigation.

Why Were Prepayment Penalties Eliminated?

Opinion: Prepayment penalties were helpful to some borrowers

Aug. 11, 2016

By JACK GUTTENTAG The Mortgage Professor (Tribune News Service)

Before the financial crisis, many mortgage contracts contained a provision stating that borrowers who paid off their loan early had to pay a penalty.

Prepayment penalties were usually expressed as a percent of the outstanding balance at time of prepayment or a specified number of months of interest.

In most cases, the penalties declined with the passage of time and usually disappeared entirely after five years or so. Partial prepayments of up to 20 percent of the balance usually were allowed in any one year without a penalty.

Sometimes the penalty applied to a home purchase transaction as well as a refinancing, but more commonly it applied only to a refinance.

Prepayment penalties were never allowed on loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department Veterans Affairs, but after the financial crisis Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also barred them.

Today, penalties are permitted only in the remaining sliver of the market not touched by the federal agencies -- which is no more than 10 percent of the total.

Many say "good riddance," but I view it as the loss of an option that some borrowers could use to their benefit.

Prepayment Penalties as a Useful Option
Here is a letter I received before the financial crisis:

"We are committing ourselves up to the limit of our capacity to buy the house we want. Our broker said we could reduce the rate from 7 percent to 6.75 percent if we accepted a prepayment penalty. This would reduce our payment by $35 a month, which would help a lot. Should we?"

This offer was typical at that time.

Lenders, and the investors who purchased loans from lenders in the secondary market, were willing to accept a lower rate in exchange for a prepayment penalty. The benefit of a prepayment penalty to them was that it discouraged refinancing if interest rates declined in the future.

The borrower received the immediate and concrete benefit of a lower rate, and gave up the right to refinance freely when and if the opportunity presented itself.

So why has this useful option gone away?

One reason is that the penalties were widely used in connection with subprime mortgages, with resulting guilt by association.

Guilt by Association: Prepayment Penalties on Subprime Mortgages
Here is another pre-crisis letter:

"Because I have very bad credit, I agreed to pay 11 percent for a 30-year mortgage. Friends have warned me to avoid a prepayment penalty, but when I ask the loan officer about this, he says that the lender absolutely requires it. Do I have any options?"

I advised this borrower at the time that he might be able to negotiate a less burdensome penalty clause but that he would not be able to rid himself of it entirely.

Lenders generally demanded prepayment penalties on subprime loans because the risk of refinancing was so high.

As with prime borrowers, subprime borrowers could refinance if market rates went down, and they could also refinance if their credit rating improved, even when the general level of mortgage rates did not change.

For example, I estimated that if this borrower made all payments on time for two years, and assuming no change in the general market, he might be able to refinance an 11 percent loan into a 7-8 percent loan.

Because of high origination costs and high default costs, subprime lending was not profitable if the good loans walked out the door after only two years.

When the subprime market collapsed under the weight of declining home values and rising foreclosures, the negative fallout associated with everything "subprime" extended to the onerous prepayment penalties that were part of every such loan. This was the "guilt by association."

Many Prime Borrowers Were Never Offered the Option
The subprime experience might not have had the impact it did if the practice of offering a prepayment option on prime loans was widespread, but it was not.

Loan officers usually press to close a transaction as soon as possible, and offering options slows down the process.

The upshot is that during the years that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac allowed prepayment penalties, many prime borrowers who would have selected a prepayment option if it had been offered, never had the chance.

In addition, some prime borrowers years later found themselves with a prepayment penalty for which they had received no compensation.

Contract Chicanery Often Involved Prepayment Penalties
Contract chicanery is the practice of surreptitiously slipping a provision disadvantageous to the borrower into the mortgage note.

Ordinarily, the borrower does not see the note until shortly before the closing, and probably does not read it then.

Before the financial crisis, prepayment penalties were the most common objective of contract chicanery. This is despite the fact that the mandatory Truth in Lending Act disclosure received by every borrower had a section on prepayment penalties. The disclosure was so ambiguously worded, however, that many borrowers who read the disclosure missed the point.

Concluding Comment
The sequence of events described above can be generalized as follows:

  • An option useful to some borrowers is used by some lenders to abuse other borrowers.

  • Regulators fail to curb the abuses through mandatory disclosures or other devices that would allow the option to continue.

  • So the regulators eliminate the option.

In my view, this amounts to regulatory failure.

Such failures are not limited to prepayment penalties, and in the weeks ahead I will discuss some other areas where it has happened.

About the Writer
Jack Guttentag is professor emeritus of finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

e-mail writer: [email protected]

next story

back to current headlines

Financial Regulation News | Mortgage Regulations
Bank and mortgage regulators, regulations and regulatory actions. Coverage of regulatory legislation and testimony.
Nonprime and Subprime News | Subprime Statistics
Stories about non-QM products. Coverage of subprime, Alt-A and
hard money lending. Home-equity loans and home-equity lines of credit.

To see more of the The Mortgage Professor or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to

Copyright (c) 2016, The Mortgage Professor

Distributed by Tribune News Service.

This story was distributed by TNS - Tribune News Service
Logout forgot

SUBSCRIBERS: Edit Subscription | Subscription Help | or call 214.521.1300

Subscribe Contact Us Site Map

Copyright © 2017 Mortgage Daily, D a l l a s
Subsribers Only:

AMC directory

ARM indexes

mortgage company directory

mortgage regulations

net branch directory

p r i c i n g engine directory

wholesale lender directory

More Mortgage News Resources (full site map):

advertising news

appraisal news

bank news

biggest lenders

commercial mortgage news

corporate mortgage news

credit news

FHA news

financial regulation news

foreclosure news

GSE news

jumbo mortgage news

interest rates

loan modification news

loan originator survey

LOS Newsletter


mortgage associations

mortgage-backed securities

mortgage books

mortgage brokers

mortgage compliance

mortgage conferences

mortgage directories

mortgage education

mortgage employment

mortgage employment index

mortgage executives

mortgage fraud

mortgage fraud blog

mortgage fraud local news

Mortgage Fraud Index

Mortgage Graveyard

mortgage insurance news

mortgage lawsuits

mortgage leads

mortgage lender ranking

mortgage licenses

mortgage litigation

Mortgage Litigation Index

Mortgage Market Index

mortgage mergers

mortgage news

mortgage politics

mortgage press releases

mortgage production

mortgage public relations

mortgage rates

mortgage servicing

mortgage statistics

mortgage technology

mortgage video

mortgage Webinars

net branch

net branch directory

nonprime news

origination news

originator tools

real estate news

refinance news

reverse mortgage news

secondary marketing

social media

servicing news

subprime news

wholesale lenders