Mortgage Daily Logo

Behind-the-Scenes Look at Collapse of Wachovia, WaMu

Mortgage News

It was nearly four years ago that Washington Mutual Bank and Wachovia went into a tailspin and were eventually deemed insolvent. A behind-the-scenes look at the demise of the two companies by a regulatory insider reveals two different strategies used in resolving the institutions.

On Sept. 25, 2008, Washington Mutual Bank was seized by the Office of Thrift Supervision. JPMorgan Chase & Co. stepped in to acquire the bank. Parent Washington Mutual Inc. subsequently filed bankruptcy.

Former WaMu chief executive officer Kerry Killinger testified in April before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission that the failure of the West Coast-based bank was unfair, and it was not afforded “the benefits extended to, and actions taken on behalf of, other financial services companies within days of Washington Mutual’s seizure.”

But John Corston has a different perspective.

Corston is acting deputy director, complex financial institution branch, division of supervision and consumer protection, for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. He testified before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Wednesday, according to a transcript of his prepared statement.

Concerns about Wachovia began in March 2008, when the FDIC downgraded the bank’s Large Insured Depository Institution rating/outlook to “C Negative.” The rating is given to banks considered to have an elevated risk profile.

“Wachovia posed ‘increased risk as a result of weaknesses in risk management, asset write-downs associated with continuing market disruption, and rapid credit quality deterioration in certain portfolios, primarily the pay-option ARM [adjustable rate mortgage] portfolio,'” Corston stated.

FDIC discussions with Wachovia’s regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, were followed three months later by a downgrade of Wachovia’s CAMELS rating to a composite “3” rating. CAMELS is a supervisory risk rating system used by bank regulators that analyzes capital, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity.

Concerns about structured finance mark-to-market valuation adjustments and increased loan-loss provisions contributed to the downgrade. Wachovia was unable to unload its inventory of subprime mortgages, syndicated credits within collateralized loan obligations and commercial real estate credits because of market disruptions. In addition, credit quality declined on the assets and Wachovia wrote down the goodwill established for its acquisition of Golden West Financial Corp.

Wachovia’s outlook turned more bleak in late September 2008 following Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy, and mostly large commercial depositors yanked more than $8.3 billion in deposits out of the bank — prompting a meeting between senior executives and FDIC staff.

The situation became more dire on Sept. 25 when two regular Wachovia counterparties declined to lend to the firm. The OCC issued a statement to the FDIC on Friday, Sept. 26, however, indicating Wachovia’s liquidity position remained manageable.

But shares of Wachovia plunged anyway. Credit default swap spreads widened sharply, and many counterparties began requiring collateralization on any transactions. At the same time, Friday’s deposit outflows accelerated to nearly $6 billion.

“By the end of the day, Wachovia management informed bank regulators that with the lack of market acceptance of Wachovia’s liabilities, the institution faced a near-term liquidity crisis,” Corston stated. “This set in motion a highly-accelerated effort to find an acquirer for the institution that would provide for protection of depositors and minimization of damage to the wider financial system.”

Wachovia was found to pose a systemic risk, and the FDIC had little time to develop its options for resolving the Charlotte, N.C.-based institution. Citigroup Inc.’s bid to acquire Wachovia in a deal where the government would eat the first $42 billion in losses was approved by regulators along with a systemic risk exception on Sept. 26.

But on Oct. 3, Wells Fargo & Co. stepped in with a bid that required no government assistance and gave Wachovia stockholders a better deal — leading to the Dec. 31, 2008, closing of Wells’ acquisition of Wachovia Corp.

Corston noted that resolution of WaMu was far simpler. While its assets were huge — $300 billion — it operated under a “vastly simpler” structure compared to its peers. Its main institutional focus was on mortgage lending; it didn’t use derivatives as part of a market-making operation, it held no foreign deposits and there were no major holding company subsidiaries involved in significant financial services.

Seattle-based WaMu began marketing itself in early 2008, and several interested institutions conducted extensive due diligence. By the time the FDIC began making plans for an orderly resolution of WaMu, many potential acquirers had already done their own due diligence — easing the pressure of a short period for the bidding process.

By the time JPMorgan acquired the bank on Sept. 25 — one day earlier than plan — the FDIC was able to arrange for the orderly transfer of more than 2,300 WaMu branches in just one day versus the usual required time of a full weekend.

“The contrast between WaMu and Wachovia — two large, FDIC-insured depository institutions that collapsed during the same week in late September 2008 — illustrates how the complexities of resolving large institutions could, under the rules in place in 2008, result in disparate treatment for investors and counterparties in different institutions,” the FDIC official stated. “In the case of WaMu, the FDIC had adequate time to develop strategies and understand the risks associated with those strategies.

“In the case of Wachovia, the FDIC wasn’t informed until the weekend of its collapse and as a result, had very limited information that could be used to understand the market implications — especially in a market that was extremely unstable — or to develop a resolution strategy.”

Related Posts

Centex Home Equity Announces Name and Brand Change to National Mortgage, LLC

Third-Quarter 2012 Mortgage Litigation Index

Lawsuits involving excessive fees, servicing fees and loan fees beyond state maximums. Defendant Plaintiff Court Amount Overview Case Title Case Number Date Filed Date of Activity Link to Story Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Orangeburg County, Richland County, South...

Centex Home Equity Announces Name and Brand Change to National Mortgage, LLC

Net Branch Lawsuits

Litigation involving net branch operations. Defendant Plaintiff Court Amount Overview Case Title Case Number Date Filed Date of Activity Link to Story PHH Mortgage Corp. Mathews Supreme Court of Virginia na Court held that the term "branch office" includes not only...

Centex Home Equity Announces Name and Brand Change to National Mortgage, LLC

Whistleblower Lawsuits

Litigation related to loan servicing, including escrow issues, transfer of servicing and servicing borrowers in bankruptcy and foreclosure.   Defendant Plaintiff Court Amount Overview Case Title Case Number Date Filed Date of Activity Link to Story Bank of...

Popular posts

How Long Does It Take to Refinance a Mortgage
How Long Does It Take to Refinance a Mortgage

So, you’re interested in refinancing your mortgage. Maybe you want some extra capital to do that home project you’ve always dreamed of, interest rates are nearing record lows, or you want to start consolidating debt. Regardless of the motivation behind the refinance,...

How Does Refinancing a Mortgage Work
How Does Refinancing a Mortgage Work

A home purchase is considered an investment, and a robust one at that. Savvy owners are constantly looking for new ways to reduce debt, save money, pay less in interest, and ultimately build equity. Refinancing is one way to leverage your investment and do just that....

What Does It Mean to Refinance Your Home
What Does It Mean to Refinance Your Home

You can think of refinancing your mortgage as a debt redo. Essentially, you’ll swap out the existing loan for a new one - ideally with better terms and conditions. Only this time it could help you save money on high mortgage payments, rather than just borrow it....

Setting up the Utilities in My New House
Setting up the Utilities in My New House

All the tedious, time-consuming paperwork has been signed, sealed, and delivered. Your belongings are packed into what seems like a million boxes and you have a solid plan to haul all your existing furniture to the new place. Just as your boxes and furniture need to...

When Is My First Mortgage Payment Due?
When Is My First Mortgage Payment Due?

Navigating your way through a brand-new mortgage loan can be a difficult task, especially for first-time homeowners.   After handing over a large sum of money for the down payment and closing costs, it’s important to pay attention to the timing of your first...

Newsletter

Don’t worry, we don’t spam