Mortgage Daily Logo

Regulation of Nontraditional Loans Proposed

Mortgage News

Regulation of Nontraditional Loans Proposed

Bankers, lenders weigh in on guidance

March 30, 2006

By COCO SALAZAR

photo of Coco Salazar
Proposed regulations on less traditional mortgages drew sharp criticism from banking and mortgage groups.

At issue is the proposed Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Products.

Worries of growth in less traditional loan products in a rising rate environment spurred issuance of the proposed guidelines in December by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Office of Thrift Supervision and the National Credit Union Administration. The regulators worried non-traditional mortgages could strain the finances of borrowers and banks.

The Mortgage Bankers Association’s senior vice president for government affairs, Kurt Pfotenhauer, said the group “believes the creation of guidance on nontraditional products is a positive development, but we find the proposed guidance is overly prescriptive in mandating specific underwriting standards and that some sections should be clarified, modified or removed to ensure that the proposed guidance does not stifle mortgage product innovation and hurt consumers’ access to homeownership opportunities.”

In a letter submitted to the federal banking regulators Wednesday, the mortgage bankers, citing examples of the wide acceptance adjustable-rate mortgages gained in the high interest rate environment of the 1980s and the more recent boost in hybrid ARMs, explained that the mortgage market is constantly developing loan features that may be termed “nontraditional” but are beneficial to borrowers.

Such is the case for IO and payment-option mortgages, MBA said. IO mortgages reportedly accounted for 23 percent of the volume in the first half of 2005.

Lenders “have successfully offered such products for decades, through different market cycles, without a threat to their safety and soundness,” MBA said. Therefore, it is prudent that regulators not impose prescriptive requirements that would force lenders to change proven standards and disadvantage institutions that have the longest experience in offering such products.

Additionally, IO and option mortgages “do not pose unmanageable risks,” thereby the “guidance should not start from the premise that the risks of these products are somehow more unmanageable than the risks of any other mortgage products,” the Washington, D.C.-based trade group added.

The American Bankers Association concurred, saying the guidance’s tenor that less traditional products are inherently riskier than other loans is incorrect, as “they simply present different types of risks that may be well-managed by prudent lenders. In fact a number of savings associations and national banks have managed the risks from these products for two decades.”

The mortgage bankers say reports and data indicate that borrowers of such loans generally have higher credit scores and lower loan-to-value ratios, and confirm that “lenders understand that risk-layering, as is pointed out in the Proposed Guidance, requires lenders to contemplate mitigating factors.”

“We want to ensure that guidance on these products maintains the safety and soundness of Federally-regulated institutions without disrupting mortgage market innovation or curtailing consumer access to financing,” the mortgage bankers’ Pfotenhauer said. “Secondary market investors, through pricing, have already required lenders to address many of the concerns identified by the Federal regulators.”

MBA additionally found that the guidance does not appear to recognize lenders treat IO and payment-option mortgages differently in terms of credit policy, underwriting standards, and risk management, and infers the same policies should apply to both products. For example, the guidance, reportedly asserts: “For all nontraditional mortgage loan products, the analysis of borrowers’ repayment capacity should include an evaluation of their ability to repay the debt by final maturity at the fully indexed rate, assuming a fully amortizing repayment schedule.”

The guidance also proposes underwriting nontraditional mortgages to a worst-case scenario that is not standard practice for other variable-rate products.

“Automated tools and advanced risk modeling have allowed lenders to go beyond simple thresholds for borrowers that exhibit risk mitigating characteristics,” MBA said. Rather than regressing to adopting prescriptive and rigid underwriting standards, lenders could instead be advised to consider the length of the interest-only period in determining whether or not to qualify the borrower on the interest-only payment or the amortizing payment.

Another specific concern of the MBA is that guidance’s language creates additional disclosures that will turn out into a more fragmented system for consumers rather than using the Federal Reserve’s regulatory authority under the Truth in Lending Act and/or working with the Department of Housing and Urban Development on the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act to improve and standardize disclosures for all consumers.

America’s Community Bankers support appropriate disclosures to potential borrowers about alternative mortgage terms, but not the proposed requirement to have lenders determine the “suitability” of mortgage products for the individual consumer.

“We do not believe it is appropriate or possible for the lender to dictate the best mortgage products for individual consumers,” the community bankers said.

ABA noted that the fact that the guidance’s consumer protections will apply only to regulated financial institutions and their affiliates is inconsistent with other consumer provisions under Regulations B and Z and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and leaves a significant portion of the mortgage industry unaffected.

Requiring lenders to use control systems to ensure practices are consistent with their policies and procedures for loans originated internally, through brokers or other third parties and those it purchases “will result not only in uneven application of the Guidance throughout the mortgage industry but also in covered lenders being given the task of somehow policing lenders” that are not subject to the actual disclosure requirements, the ABA said.

MBA added that holding federally-regulated institutions responsible for the marketing practices of third party originators, is “significantly beyond the institutions’ control and reasonable ability to comply,” thus “such a standard is not in place for traditional mortgage products and should not be implemented for nontraditional mortgage products.”

MBA said it also disagrees with the assertion that voluntary repurchase of loans constitutes “implicit recourse” requiring risk-based capital be maintained against the entire portfolio. MBA suggested removing the concept of “implicit recourse” from the guidance and the additional risk-based capital requirement beyond that which is legally required.


Coco Salazar is an assistant editor and staff writer for MortgageDaily.com.e-mail: MortgageWriter@aol.com

Related Posts

NewDay USA CEO Rob Posner Expects 10% Increase in 2019 Mortgage Loan Volume

There is No Such Thing as a Free House …

Over the past several years, those who service loans in the State of Washington(1) have seen a dramatic rise in the number of lawsuits in which delinquent borrowers seek to quiet title to their homes on the grounds that lenders are barred from foreclosing based on...

NewDay USA CEO Rob Posner Expects 10% Increase in 2019 Mortgage Loan Volume

The Mortgage Graveyard 2018 Archives

The Mortgage Graveyard 2018 Archives Failed, Struggling and Acquired Mortgage-Related Companies Non-Bank Closures 3 Bank Failures (FDIC) 0 Credit Union Failures 0 Total Mortgage-Related Failures 3  

NewDay USA CEO Rob Posner Expects 10% Increase in 2019 Mortgage Loan Volume

MBS Statistics

MBS Statistics Non-Agency Issuance 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Private Label RMBS Issuance (S&P) $80 billion to $100 billion (est) $70 billion $34...

NewDay USA CEO Rob Posner Expects 10% Increase in 2019 Mortgage Loan Volume

Sample E-Mail

Sample E-Mail   Covering the Real Estate Finance Since 1999  Mortgage Industry News free news content | view headlines online  Advertorial Text Ad This ad includes a linked bold headline of up to 50 characters and up to 100 words of text. The ad can be...

Popular posts

How Long Does It Take to Refinance a Mortgage
How Long Does It Take to Refinance a Mortgage

So, you’re interested in refinancing your mortgage. Maybe you want some extra capital to do that home project you’ve always dreamed of, interest rates are nearing record lows, or you want to start consolidating debt. Regardless of the motivation behind the refinance,...

How Does Refinancing a Mortgage Work
How Does Refinancing a Mortgage Work

A home purchase is considered an investment, and a robust one at that. Savvy owners are constantly looking for new ways to reduce debt, save money, pay less in interest, and ultimately build equity. Refinancing is one way to leverage your investment and do just that....

What Does It Mean to Refinance Your Home
What Does It Mean to Refinance Your Home

You can think of refinancing your mortgage as a debt redo. Essentially, you’ll swap out the existing loan for a new one - ideally with better terms and conditions. Only this time it could help you save money on high mortgage payments, rather than just borrow it....

Setting up the Utilities in My New House
Setting up the Utilities in My New House

All the tedious, time-consuming home closing documents have been signed, sealed, and delivered. Your belongings are packed into what seems like a million boxes and you have a solid plan to haul all your existing furniture to the new place. Just as your boxes and...

When Is My First Mortgage Payment Due?
When Is My First Mortgage Payment Due?

Navigating your way through a brand new mortgage loan can be a difficult task, especially for first time homeowners. After handing over a large sum of money for the down payment and closing costs, it’s important to pay attention to the timing of your first mortgage...

Newsletter

Don’t worry, we don’t spam

calculate your monthly mortgage payment

Related Topics

Helpful Links

Daily mortgage rate trends

Best mortgage lenders

First-time homebuyers programs by state

Loan limits by state

Types of mortgages

APR vs interest rate

Understanding PMI